Picasso CPI Governance Assessment

SAP CPI assessment to decide with evidence before go-live, production or migration.

We evaluate SAP CPI / SAP Integration Suite landscapes, compare environments and document technical risks so architecture, PMO and SAP teams can decide with clarity.

Picasso CPI Governance Assessment turns homogeneous API or ZIP export evidence into a traceable inventory, a difference matrix and a DevOps roadmap. It can start with read-only tenant access or environment exports, depending on client policies.

Request SAP CPI assessment Evaluate environment risk

When SAP CPI grows without governance, risk appears late.

SAP CPI often starts as a quick response to integration needs: connecting SuccessFactors, HCM, payroll, WFM, APIs, ERPs, external systems or critical business processes. Over time, packages grow, iFlows multiply and each environment starts telling a different story.

The problem is not having many interfaces. The problem is not knowing with certainty what exists in each environment, what changed, what reached production, what configuration is out of control and what technical risk may affect the next deployment or a future migration.

Common pain points

  • No reliable inventory of packages and iFlows.
  • DEV, QA, UAT and PROD are not aligned.
  • Undocumented differences exist between environments.
  • No clear visibility of versions, endpoints, adapters and parameters.
  • Dependencies or configurations may affect a Neo to Cloud Foundry migration.
  • Errors surface late: during go-live, hypercare or production.
Our solution

A consulting assessment for SAP CPI governance.

Picasso CPI Governance Assessment does not stop at listing iFlows or producing a decorative report. We build real visibility over the integration landscape, identify differences across environments, document technical evidence and translate findings into concrete actions.

The assessment is supported by internal analysis capabilities to review available exports, snapshots and configurations. We do not infer dependencies without technical support and we state limitations when evidence is not enough for a responsible conclusion.

The promise is simple: understand what you have, where your environments differ, what risks exist and what actions to take to govern SAP CPI integrations better.

For CPI landscapes with real complexity

Designed for multiple environments, critical integrations, inherited tenants, go-live pressure or scenarios where architecture and PMO need evidence before deciding.

Technical capabilities

CPI inventory

Client/project/environment registry (DEV, QA, UAT, PROD or others) with runtime identification (Neo / Cloud Foundry / unknown) and safe metadata.

Environment comparison

Differences by existence, version, endpoints, adapters, parameters, configuration and available resources.

Artifact analysis

Technical extraction and review when evidence exists: Groovy, JavaScript, XSLT, mappings, WSDL/XSD/EDMX, properties/parameters and more.

Structured findings

Findings with severity, category and auditable evidence (without secrets), separating expected per-environment differences vs items that require review.

Security and governance

We do not store secrets in plain text or print tokens/passwords/certificates. Credential references are reported as Security Material objects that require an owner and process.

Neo to Cloud Foundry Readiness

BTP dependency signals, configuration and relevant tasks before planning a transition from Neo to Cloud Foundry.

Formal modalities

Two ways to start, one rule: comparable evidence.

API Assessment

We use controlled read-only access to the SAP CPI / SAP Integration Suite tenant. We capture role-permitted capabilities, API-source snapshots and technical evidence without modifying iFlows, packages or configurations.

Offline/File-based Assessment

We work with ZIP exports of packages or iFlows by environment when the client cannot allow direct access. We process provided evidence, generate snapshots and do not retain the original ZIP by default.

Homogeneous evidence

For formal comparison, all active environments must be captured from the same source: DEV / QA / PROD via API, or DEV / QA / PROD with equivalent ZIP exports. If evidence is mixed, it is declared as a limitation and we recommend homogeneous recapture before concluding environment differences.

API Assessment: controlled read-only capture

When the client authorizes direct access, we execute a capture limited to available permissions. The result reflects the capture moment and the capabilities enabled by roles and authorizations.

  • No tenant, package, iFlow or artifact changes.
  • Does not replace SAP ALM, SAP Transport Management or runtime monitoring.
  • Documents what could be queried by environment and what remained out of scope.

Offline/File-based Assessment: ZIP export evidence

When direct tenant access is not available, the client provides exports by environment. This reduces security friction and allows technical evidence review while stating that it does not replace runtime validation.

  • Useful for restrictive policies or third-party tenants.
  • Depends on exports representing the agreed scope.
  • Does not include logs, metrics or full runtime state unless present in evidence.
Neo to Cloud Foundry Readiness

A specialized capability, not an automatic migration promise.

For clients still operating SAP CPI on Neo, we include a readiness view that identifies signals, dependencies and relevant tasks before planning a transition to Cloud Foundry.

  • Prepares the technical migration conversation with evidence.
  • Does not execute deploys, connectivity tests or automatic migrations.
  • Does not replace runtime validation or formal Cloud Foundry testing.

What we analyze (when evidence exists)

Technical analysis depends on what the client provides or enables per mode. We do not “guess” what is not supported by evidence.

  • Packages, iFlows, versions, artifacts and available internal resources.
  • Groovy, JavaScript, XSLT, mappings, properties/parameters.
  • WSDL, XSD, EDMX, JAR and auxiliary resources (when present in exports).
  • Endpoint, adapter, destination, dependency and Security Material references (without exposing secrets).

How findings are delivered

Findings are delivered with structure and evidence: severity, category, impact and rationale. When applicable, we reference SAP documentation and clearly declare limitations by information source.

  • Expected per-environment drift vs differences that require review.
  • Auditable technical evidence (hash/metadata), with no tokens or passwords.
  • Remediation backlog: prioritization and recommended steps (no auto-remediation).

Limitations by evidence source

The assessment is responsible with what it can conclude. Offline analysis depends on export quality and completeness. API analysis depends on roles, authorizations and enabled capabilities.

  • It does not include full runtime observability.
  • It may not reflect logs, metrics or production errors.
  • It may not show actual deployed configuration if the export does not contain it.
  • We do not infer dependencies without sufficient technical evidence.
  • Formal comparison requires homogeneous evidence across environments.
  • The report declares reviewed sources, scope and limitations.

What it is not

  • It does not replace SAP ALM.
  • It does not replace SAP Transport Management.
  • It is not continuous runtime monitoring.
  • It does not modify tenants, packages, iFlows or artifacts without authorization.
  • It does not produce a formal comparison when environment evidence is mixed.
  • It does not execute automatic remediation, Neo to Cloud Foundry migration or fixes unless explicitly in scope.
Deliverables

From technical evidence to governance decisions.

01Technical inventory
02DEV / QA / UAT / PROD matrix
03DevOps roadmap
FindingsSeverity, impact and evidence
ReportExecutive and technical
ScopeSource and limitations by environment

Value for your organization

Less risk before production

Detect environment differences and prioritize actions before go-live, hypercare or critical deployment windows.

Better traceability

Reduce dependence on informal knowledge and give visibility to architecture, PMO, support and SAP teams.

Actionable roadmap

Turn technical findings into a plan to mature governance, documentation, transports, migration readiness and operation.

Value for SAP partners

For SAP consulting firms and partners, the assessment works as a technical validation layer before go-live, support or project transition. Picasso T&S can act as the architecture arm when integration becomes the delivery bottleneck.

  • Consulting firms that inherited CPI tenants from other teams.
  • Partners that need to validate environments before a critical release.
  • PMOs that require technical evidence for decisions.
  • Projects where the functional team does not have deep integration capacity.

Use cases

Before go-live

Validate differences and risks before moving critical integrations.

Inherited tenants

Organize CPI landscapes with insufficient documentation or multiple teams involved.

DEV / QA / PROD comparison

Confirm which iFlows, endpoints, adapters or configurations are not aligned.

Authorized API Assessment

Capture read-only evidence when the client allows controlled tenant access.

Offline assessment

Analyze ZIP exports by environment when direct access is not possible.

Neo to Cloud Foundry Readiness

Identify risks, dependencies and tasks before planning a migration from Neo to Cloud Foundry.

Requirements to start

Before reviewing the landscape, we define modality, scope and available evidence. The assessment can be complete or limited to critical packages, environments or iFlows.

  • Environment list: DEV, QA, UAT, PROD or others.
  • Priority packages or iFlows if the scope is partial.
  • Chosen modality: API Assessment or Offline/File-based Assessment.
  • Homogeneous evidence by environment when formal comparison is required.
  • Existing technical documentation and owners for clarification.
  • Criticality criteria: payroll, SuccessFactors, HCM, WFM, finance or APIs.
  • Current runtime context if Neo to Cloud Foundry review is required.
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

  • No. It is a consulting service supported by internal analysis capabilities to turn CPI evidence into inventory, comparison, findings and a DevOps roadmap. It is not sold as SaaS or an automatic platform.
  • Yes. We can work with Offline/File-based Assessment using ZIP exports of packages or iFlows by environment. The analysis is based on the evidence provided and states its limitations.
  • It is a read-only modality with controlled access to the SAP CPI / SAP Integration Suite tenant. We capture capabilities allowed by roles, snapshots and API evidence without modifying iFlows or configurations.
  • It is a modality based on ZIP exports provided by the client. We process the evidence, generate snapshots and compare environments when exports are equivalent by scope and source.
  • They can be used as a diagnosis of non-homogeneous evidence, but not as a formal comparison. For rigorous environment comparison, all environments must be captured from the same source: API or equivalent ZIP exports.
  • By default we do not retain the original ZIPs. We extract metadata, hashes and evidence required for the analysis, and final handling is agreed according to client policy.
  • No. It does not replace SAP ALM or SAP Transport Management. It helps understand the CPI landscape, document risks and prioritize governance and DevOps actions.
  • No. It reflects the evidence captured at the moment of the assessment. It is not continuous runtime observability or production monitoring.
  • It is a specialized capability inside the assessment to identify signals, dependencies and tasks before planning a transition from Neo to Cloud Foundry. It does not execute automatic migrations.
  • We do not promise total detection. We identify dependencies when there is enough evidence in artifacts, configurations, parameters, exports or API-enabled information.
  • A technical inventory, a comparison matrix when evidence is homogeneous, findings with severity and impact, evidence, recommendations and a DevOps roadmap.

Understand your SAP CPI landscape before the next critical deployment.

You do not need to wait until go-live, audit or migration to discover environment differences. We can start with read-only API Assessment or Offline/File-based Assessment using ZIP exports; if evidence is not homogeneous, we define the right recapture first.

Request SAP CPI assessment